About 457,000 results
Open links in new tab
  1. SSE 4.2 on which processors? - Intel Community

    Aug 1, 2008 · SSE4.1 and seven other new SSE4 instructions are supported in 45 nm Intel processors based on a new microarchitecture (code named Nehalem). The subset of the 7 new SSE4 instructions available to Intel processors based on the Nehalem microarchitecture is referred to as SSE4.2 in this document.

  2. Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 - SSE4 - Intel Communities

    Aug 28, 2012 · Hi according to the many articles I have read, the C2D E7500 supports SSE4.1, however I have just downloaded the latest Intel CPU ID utility and it states that SSE4 is not a feature of this CPU. The version of Intel CPU ID is 4.50.20120413. However the older version of intel CPU ID 4.32.20110608 says that the CPU does have the SSE4 feature.

  3. SSE4a instructions support - Intel Community

    Aug 6, 2010 · Note that most AMD and Intel processors produced today support the SSE2 and SSE3 instruction sets. The SSE4a instruction set is unique to AMD processors and is not supported by the Intel IPP library. As you can see from the chart in the table above, after SSE3, the library supports the SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES-NI and AVX instruction sets.

  4. Intel Xeon E5-2698V3 SSE4.2 Support

    Jul 12, 2018 · Indeed the E5-2698V3 and probably all E5-26xxV3 processor family does not support SSE4 instructions. They do support SSE3 and SSSE3 (supplemental SSE3). So even if it appears to be supported under certain conditions, it is not officially supported. I hope this clears things out. Eduardo_B

  5. sse4.2 instructions - Intel Community

    May 1, 2009 · While the gcc/g++/gfortran use of sse4 code shows some consistent performance gains over sse3, sse4.1 isn't used in the same ways in my code samples by gcc and Intel compilers, with the exception of the _mm_set_ps, where both compilers shift to sse4.1 code (so it's not necessary to shift source code to the corresponding sse4.1 intrinsic). g++ 4 ...

  6. sse4 vs. avx2 - Intel Community

    Aug 10, 2018 · I find that I'm getting near identical performance in speed for running CNNs on the CPU when using AVX2 and SSE4 as the extension (choosing libcpu_extension_avx2.so and libcpu_extension_sse4.so respectively) Looking at the Intel hardware specification, AVX2 can do 32 single precision FP operations per second, while SSE4.2 can only do 8.

  7. MP3,1 (& others?) SSE 4.2 emulation (to enable AMD Metal driver)

    Oct 19, 2019 · MouSSE is a partial SSE4.2 emulator that allows those old CPUs to use the newer AMD drivers. While its primary focus has always been making the AMD drivers work, it also appears to allow World of Warcraft to run on a Mac Pro 3,1 regardless of whether or not AMD drivers are in use.

  8. AVX vs. SSE4.2 performance on Sandybridge - Intel Community

    Feb 28, 2013 · Then I compiled the code using two options: 1) /QxSSE4.2 and /QaxAVX; 2) /QxSSE4.2 and ran both on E5-2690. I was expecting for the single precision an 8x peak performance improvement with AVX and a 4x improvement with SSE4.2 by vectorization. But the results I got didn't match my expection.

  9. MP3,1 (& others?) SSE 4.2 emulation (to enable AMD Metal driver)

    Oct 19, 2019 · SSE4.2 consists of 6 or 7 instructions. SSE4.2 "proper" consists of CRC32, PCMPGTQ, PCMPESTRI, PCMPESTRM, PCMPISTRI, and PCMPISTRM. Another instruction, POPCNT, was introduced at the same time as SSE4.2, and is often lumped together with them, even though they're not actually related. MouSSE implements CRC32, PCMPGTQ, and …

  10. best practice for evaluating AVX2 vs SSE4 parallel task power?

    Apr 3, 2017 · Hi, I'm working with some on demand, latency sensitive computations which parallel well and typically take 10-30ms to complete. VTune indicates their AVX implementation is generally higher latency than SSE because SpeedStep is less aggressive in boosting core frequencies from idle with AVX. The add...

Refresh