Apr 19, 2016 · -- In "has had", "has" is an auxiliary verb, "had" is the past participle form of "to have". -- In "had had", the first "had" is an auxiliary verb, the second "had" is the past participle form of "to have". If the information in the canonical post is a little too advanced for you, you can google for "English present perfect past perfect".

Have had is used for one-time occurrences, but had can be used for such occurrences as well; Have or simple present is used for something more habitual; So does that mean have had and had are interchangeable? People who have had their belongings taken will turn into miserable people. [= "People who had their belongings taken will turn into ...

Sep 24, 2015 · I have had this car for 5 years. I have had the ice cream. Both the sentences are in the present perfect. The word "have" is an auxiliary verb. The word "had" is the past participle of the verb "have". The main verb " have" in the form of the past participle has been used in different senses in these sentences.

May 24, 2021 · The two instances of “had had” play different grammatical roles in the sentences—the first is a modifier while the second is the main verb of the sentence. I don't understand the grammatical explanation given for this sentence. How does had had had had make sense and is grammatical? I understand that had had is correct, but not had had ...

In 3), the "had" is a past-tense state-of-being verb. The structure of 3) is rarely used on its own. Often, it's used to suggest that one thing is even further in the past than another: 4) I had seen the film when I read the book. The action of "to read" is in the past.

Apr 18, 2020 · 1.The bank crash has had a ripple effect on the whole community. 2.The Bank crash has a ripple effect on the whole community. Ok, so i came across the 1st sentence on an online dictionary and i wanna ask what's the difference between the 1st senyence and the 2nd sentence( i make this sentence myself).

“She even didn’t know her grandmother had a sister.” I don’t know the grammar rule here, so the best I could say was that I’m sure ‘had’ is correct, and that because ‘has’ feels okay to me, some people must use ‘has’. In fact, because Dia is still alive, using ‘has’ makes much more sense to …

Apr 2, 2021 · "has had" is an example of the present perfect tense of the verb "to have". Has is working as an auxiliary verb, third person singular conjugation of the verb "to have" - it has no particular meaning of its own here. It's the word we use to form this particular tense in English. Had is the past participle form of the verb "to have".

May 27, 2019 · The first sentence with "had" is in the past tense. You use past tense for something that occurred in a known time in the past, which is not the case here. The second one, with "have had," which is correct, is in the present perfect tense, which describes an event that has occurred in an undefined time in the past and is still relevant now.

have/has had. have had and has had are used, as noted by Veronica Diamond in her answer (which has now been deleted), to describe something that has happened in the past. The technical term for this is the present perfect. In perfect is a technical term meaning completed, and so it roughly means: something that has been completed - now.