
A350-900 Vs. B787-10 - Airliners.net
Jun 15, 2013 · The B787-8 is about 20-25% more efficient than aircraft such as the B767, an aircraft that is over 20 years older. If the B787-10 is over 10% more efficient than the A350-900 then Airbus has made a big mistake. 10%+ lower CASM just isn't a number that I …
A350 vs B787 - Airliners.net
May 28, 2020 · As for 787 vs A350, based on my own experience from flying on them as a passenger: A350 hands down. Airbus is way better at sound insulation than Boeing, which generally goes for most products and their direct competitors (777 …
Fuel consumption A350 vs 787 - Airliners.net
Sep 11, 2018 · The difference between the A350-900 vs 787-9 can be clearly shown as it is well past this maximum range point of the 787-9 The A350-900 can perform the route on a bad day with a full passenger load.
Airbus Claims that A350XWB is quieter than B787, but is it really?
May 10, 2018 · The B787 definitely is a lot quieter than the A350. Also, the A350-900 that I flew on (AY) had a piece of paper tissue between the side panels to remind me that I sat in that exact same plane and exact same seats a few months ago.
A350 Vs B787 Rapid Decompression Grille Size - Airliners.net
Feb 6, 2016 · Hi, I would assume that the requirements for decompression grilles at the sides panels are the same for A350 and B787. Also the cabin volume is comparable. Looking at the pictures it looks like the A350 grilles have a much smaller area than the B787 grilles. Does somebody know why this is the case?
How do the 787 and 350 handle turbulence - Airliners.net
Sep 3, 2018 · The B777 and B787 both have gust suppression written into the software for the flight controls. There are static ports on each side of the vertical fin that provide additional input to the FMC to suppress the effects of turbulence.
Why do some airlines fly both Boeing 787 and Airbus A350?
Nov 21, 2019 · This may have been discussed before but I am curious to know why some airlines, notably British Airways, Singapore Airlines and Ethiopian fly both the B787 and A350. With the different variants available they now seem to be similar in size and range. It would seem more economical to fly one type.
Fuel Burn Statistics: B77W, A380, B787, B744, A350
Jun 3, 2008 · Greetings and Salutations, I've looked around but I haven't been able to find any semi-reliable fuel burn statistics for the B77W, A380, B787 (any), B744 or A359. Are there any generic, more guidance-based, fuel burn statistics for these aircraft anywhere to be found? Furthermore, does anyone know what 100KG of kerosene is in barrels? Again, I tried researching but it was a bit complex. It's ...
Does the A330-900neo burn less fuel than the A350 or 787!?
Nov 1, 2019 · Does the A330-900neo burn less fuel than the A350 or 787!? I'm wondering why DL has a subfleet of the A330-900neo instead of more A350's. I think its because the A330-900neo is lighter than the A350. What about versus the 787? I'm trying to understand DL's decision making on the A330-900neo versus the A350.
What are advantages/ disadvantages of A330-200 versus B787-8?
Feb 21, 2020 · Advantage for 787-8 (vs A330-200) - Cheaper to operate in terms of both fuel and maintenance (advantage increases with longer routes) - Potential for common type rating with future NMA (for shorter ranged, smaller A/C), A330 is only common type rated with A350 (an even larger, longer-ranged A/C) while A321LR/XLR requires a different type rating.