
Offerror/Offeree vs. Promisee/Promisor? - Law Stack Exchange
Feb 28, 2021 · Offeror a party making an offer. Promisee a party to whom a promissory obligation is owed. Promisor a party who owes a promissory obligation. I've read many English law judgments, and I always see Offeree/Offeror and Promisee/Promisor. I rarely see Obligee/Obligor. But aren't these pairs superfluous? How can they be distinguished?
What makes something an offer in contract law?
An offer is a communication by the offeror to the offeree indicating a willingness to enter into an agreement with the offeree on certain terms. If properly characterized as an offer, the communication will signal to a reasonable offeree that the offeree may create an agreement by simply accepting those terms.
What are the limits of a contract offeror's ability to designate ...
Sep 14, 2023 · The offeror is "master of the offer" including the manner in which the contract may be accepted. Where the offeror specifies that acceptance may be by specific conduct, the question becomes "whether the offeror, acting reasonably, would understand that the offeree was assenting to the terms proposed." This is acceptance by conduct.
Why doesn't Commonwealth law routinely use Acceptee, like …
Mar 13, 2021 · The Offeror and Offeree construction, like Lessor and Lessee, always comes in a pair. An act and a response to the act. But, following that logic, the "Acceptor" should be the person who accepts an offer to enter into a contract, and an acceptee should be the person who made the offer, since they receive the acceptance.
retraction of a rejection of an offer - Law Stack Exchange
Mar 6, 2019 · However, the offeror may manifest that his offer remains notwithstanding a possible rejection by the offeree. See the Restatement at § 38(1): An offeree's power of acceptance is terminated by his rejection of the offer, unless the offeror has manifested a contrary intention. (emphasis added)
contract law - What is the significance of an invitation to treat ...
Sep 8, 2023 · An invitation to treat is simply useful pragmatically and socially. It allows a potential offeror to know that this is a setting in which offers (typically in relation to items noted in the invitation to treat, and on terms that might be included in the invitation to treat) are normal.
civil law - When does silence imply consent? - Law Stack Exchange
Oct 13, 2022 · The offeror gave the offeree reason to understand that silence or inaction amounts to acceptance, and the circumstances suggest that the silent offeree intends to accept the offer. Previous dealings, such as longstanding relationships , supersede the general principle that offeree's silence is an impediment to the formation of a contract.
Who should pay for "add-ons" to a contract - Law Stack Exchange
Sep 28, 2024 · If the offeree wasn't made aware of this extra work before they entered the contract and the offeror had an opportunity to inspect could you insist they complete their contract despite the obstacles? Perhaps either party at this point could exit the contract at this point, but perhaps a little complicated if the offeror already started works.
How should "And" and "Or" be used when listing items in a …
Jan 7, 2016 · Please clarify the meaning of the statement "that the transfer of assignment shall be sibjkect to the condition that the benefiociary Bagong lipunan community association or the actual occupants of the premises in the said Bagong Lipunan sites, who are qualified in consultation with the representatives of the respective community association shall be given the right of first …
united states - Is there a legal reason why many advertisements …
Dec 18, 2022 · By specifying a deadline, the offeror preempts both the question of fact as to what constitutes reasonable time under the circumstances, Id. at 41(2), and an argument that revocation of the offer was so arbitrary that it took customers by surprise.