Fighting words are not protected speech. The test for whether hate speech is protected or not comes from a 1969 court case, Brandenburg v. Ohio, which stemmed from a Ku Klux Klan rally in Cincinnati.
His violations follow an old playbook—trigger lawsuits, giving the Supreme Court a chance to declare statutes ...
However, Meta now thinks this system is problematic,1 claiming fact-checkers have acquired too much authority in determining ...
Lincoln Heights has been in national headlines after a neo-Nazi rally on an overpass between the historically Black ...
The legal profession must give thorough consideration to data privacy and the sometimes-complex process of integrating ...
The move is intended to accelerate the ALSP’s development of AI-powered legal tech tools to serve in-house clients.
A lawyer argues that the Supreme Court must stand up to the Trump Administration and preserve the rule of law.
One of the judges whose court could hear a case challenging Trump’s agenda is Judge Jeffrey Sutton. He’s the chief judge of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback