But back to today's comparison, the Ryzen 5 3600 destroys the Core i5-9400F in core-heavy games and applications. It currently costs 33% more, but it was often 50% faster in applications and ...

Core i3 10100 vs Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5 9400F l 1080p l Games: Advertising - 0:00 Kingdom Come Deliverance - 0:28 SnowRunner - 1:40 Red Dead Redemption 2 - 3:10 Rainbow Six Siege - 4:26 ...

In more neutral benchmark territory like HandBrake, the Ryzen 5 3600 left the non Hyper-Threaded CPUs in its dust, with the Core i5-9400F taking nearly 50 percent more time to complete the task ...

Games: Project Cars Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 01:17 Kingdom Come Deliverance - 02:16 hitman 2 - 03:34 Metro Exodus - 04:35 ...

Here again, the Ryzen 5 3500X outpaces the Core i5-9400F in all four individual tests, and posted a higher overall score of 332,661 versus 317,350. Finally, the site posted some gaming benchmarks.

Between the two, the 3400G offers an additional two threads of performance but the 9400F offers a total of six true cores and an additional 5MB of L3 cache over the 3400G’s 5MB.

Yes, it's still faster than the Core i5-9400F, but it's slower than even the first-gen Ryzen 5 1600X. It is 6% slower than the R5 2600 and a whopping 27% slower than the R5 3600.

The extra threads helped in PCMark 10's image editing test and once again the Ryzen 5 3600 was in a different league, adding 33% to the score achieved by the Core i5-9400F and outstripping the old ...

You can see in my review of the Ryzen 5 3600 here where I compare it with the Core i5 9400F and in some cases the Intel CPU is on par, but in most cases slower. What AMD desperately needs is a Zen ...