Russian chess grandmaster Gary Kasparov played against Deep Blue, and Kasparov was victorious. Even as AI had matured drastically since Turing's time, a human was still able to beat a machine.

Chess enthusiasts watch World Chess champion Garry Kasparov on a television monitor as he holds his head in his hands at the start of the sixth and final match 11 May against IBM\'s Deep Blue ...

I'll leave you with a fun, human-computer chess-related anecdote. In the first game of the 1997 rematch between Garry Kasparov and Deep Blue, the computer (reportedly) encountered a bug.

You wouldn’t say: “I am not almost as good at chess as I am at backgammon.” Humans are unable to articulate fully many things that we manage to do quite well. The rules of language are one such thing.

While supercomputers—most famously IBM’s Deep Blue—have long surpassed the world’s best human chess players, generative AI still lags behind due to their underlying programming parameters.

In the years since, computers have built on Deep Blue's 1997 breakthrough to the point where the battle between humans and machines is not even close. Even chess grandmasters like author and ...

Researchers at the University of Toronto have designed a new AI model that understands how humans perceive creativity in chess. In a recent paper presented at an international conference ...

A favorite dream project of mathematical thinkers is a chess-playing machine. None has been built that will play a full game without human help, but the development of monster electronic computers ...

A computer had defeated the best chess-playing human in the world. Fifteen months later, "Deeper Blue"-Deep Blue's smarter, slicker, and better offspring-caused Kasparov to quit mid-match out of ...