March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

However, as I explain in my book “The Expressive Instinct,” art is intrinsic to human evolution and history. Just as sports or workouts exercise the body, creating art exercises the imagination and is ...

US Appeals Court Rejects Copyrights for AI-Generated Art Lacking 'Human' Creator By Blake Brittain A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed ...

However, as I explain in my book "The Expressive Instinct," art is intrinsic to human evolution and history. Just as sports or workouts exercise the body, creating art exercises the imagination ...

Thaler, of St. Charles, Missouri, applied for a copyright in 2018 covering "A Recent Entrance to Paradise," a piece of visual art he said was ... works must have human authors to be copyrightable.

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on March 18 affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence (AI) without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.

29,259 people played the daily Crossword recently. Can you solve it faster than others?29,259 people played the daily Crossword recently. Can you solve it faster than others?