Dell’s U2711, on sale for $1,100 today, seems like the monitor dreams are made of, with 2560×1440 resolution, 100 percent representation of the sRGB color space, 6ms response and a window ...

Power consumption: Armed with an LED backlight, the Dell UltraSharp U2713HM achieved fair power consumption, with a Default/On power draw of 38.4 watts, compared with the Dell UltraSharp U2711's ...

Dell's laptop and desktop lineups may hog all of the attention, but the company's range of LCDs have proven to be contenders over the years. Not one to shy away from the professionals in ...

The Dell UltraSharp U2711 lives up to its name and displays an excellent array of colors. While it may have some trouble with the dark grays this monitor makes up for that in its numerous features ...

Dell U2711 Review Manufacturer: Dell UK Price (as reviewed): £911.67 (inc VAT) US Price (as reviewed): $1,072 (ex.Tax) We were massively impressed by the HP LP2475w and its H-IPS panel.

On Thursday at CES, Dell unveiled its new 27-inch UltraSharp U2711.While its design is heavily based on the U2410, there are a few key changes that elevate the U2711 above Dell's previous great ...

ET deals: $400 off Dell U2711 27-inch WQHD monitor, $50 off remote spy tank, and more By Tim Supples May 16, 2013 ...

Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Rear Ports. Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Left. Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Angle. Comments. PCMag Newsletters Our Best Stories in Your Inbox . Follow PCMag (Opens in a new window) ...

Hi all, Looking to upgrade my old monitor setup to something newer: Currently running an HP ZR2740w as my primary, and an old Dell U2711 as my secondary. Looking at the Dell S2716DG as my new ...

Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Rear Ports. Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Left. Dell UltraSharp U2711 : Angle. More Inside PCMag.com. Rate Your Favorite PC Hardware, Peripherals, and Components to Win; ...

With the U2711 though, this simply isn't an issue. The vertical resolution of 1,440 is a huge upgrade from 1,080 or 1,200, and the screen itself is so large that the fact it's 16:9 rather than 16: ...